The letter was sent to Senate Veterans Affairs Chairman Jon Tester (D-Mont.) and ranking member Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), and obtained by Fox News Digital.
“Its latest request for an extension, made on June 1, would delay a response to the whistleblower disclosures until August 1,” the letter continues. “Yet, in the ten months since the referral to the VA, there has apparently been no progress whatsoever in correcting the problems. According to additional whistleblower disclosures as recently as this month, June 2023, the private information of veterans, whistleblowers, and your constituents is still widely, insecurely, and improperly accessible in VIEWS—vulnerable to compromise.”
Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, has already insisted on answers about Bradsher.
Earlier this year, Grassley — not a member of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee — delayed the confirmation of a different Biden VA nominee.
“The VIEWS system is under the authority of Chief of Staff Tanya Bradsher’s office. Based on reports that are supported by documents in my possession, a VA certified fraud examiner and certified auditing professional notified Ms. Bradsher’s office last year that personal identifiable information (PII), protected health information (PHI), and whistleblower information was widely accessible across VA to the thousands of VA employees with access to VIEWS, regardless of their need to know,” Grassley says in a
June 2 letter to McDonough.
Grassley asked the VA senior leadership to provide information by June 16 to his office.
“As you know, Ms. Tanya Bradsher, whose office has authority over the VIEWS system and promised to look into the matter nearly 11 months ago, is currently before the Senate as a nominee to the position of Deputy Secretary,” Grassley’s letter later adds. “In that position, she would have a key role in the VA’s electronic health records (EHR) modernization. However, the VIEWS system that is under her authority contains names, social security numbers, dates of birth, and apparently even medical records of many veterans, accessible to thousands of VA employees and not restricted to those with a direct need to know. VA and Ms. Bradsher must immediately explain their failure to protect this information for so long, even after being notified of these potential violations of federal data privacy laws.”
Bradsher was a 20-year Army veteran, and has been a public affairs official for the White House National Security Counsel, for the Defense Department and for the Department of Homeland Security.
During her May 31 confirmation hearing before the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, she got no questions about the VIEWS system, according to the two watchdog groups.
However, she did reference electronic health records.
“I will ensure that we continue to build an electronic health record system that improves care for Veterans — and that we only deploy it when fully ready,”
Bradsher said during her opening statement at the confirmation hearing.
She later said during the hearing, “The deputy secretary is ultimately responsible for the electronic healthcare record program, and if confirmed, that responsibility… will fall fully on my shoulders.”
The letter from the two watchdog groups says, “In light of that responsibility, it is crucial to examine the nominee’s record in protecting the confidentiality of electronic records.”
The Department of Veterans Affairs did not respond to inquiries from Fox News Digital for this story.
The letter from the watchdog groups notes that two days before the Senate confirmation hearing, Peter C. Rizzo, a certified fraud examiner, and former VA program manager, signed a statement about problems with the VIEWS system and complained about “unconscionable mishandling” of the data in the system.
“In her current capacity as VA Chief of Staff, Ms. Bradsher is responsible for VIEWS. Ms. Bradsher is also fully aware of VIEWS’ deficiencies and its ongoing misuse by VA employees,” Rizzo says in the statement. “I know this because on July 13, 2022, I reported these issues directly to Ms. Bradsher’s Deputy Chief of Staff, Maureen Elias, both by video chat and by email. That day, Ms. Elias gave me her word that she would immediately brief Ms. Bradsher on my concerns about VIEWS.”
The statement says that “thousands of authorized VIEWS users are able to access the system without logging in ever again after their initial VIEWS log-in.” He also states, “VA leadership has long known of VIEWS’ security vulnerabilities, and yet not one of them—Ms. Bradsher included—has demonstrated the courage and will to take necessary corrective action.”
On Aug. 2, 2022, the OSC, an independent agency that investigates whistleblower disclosures and complaints, informed Rizzo of its referral.
“Disclosures referred to the agency for investigation and a report must include information sufficient for OSC to determine whether there is a substantial likelihood of wrongdoing,” the OSC letter to Rizzo says. “After reviewing the information submitted, we have requested that the Secretary conduct an investigation into these allegations and report back to OSC… We have provided the Secretary 60 days to conduct the investigation and submit the report to OSC. However, you should be aware that these investigations usually take longer, and agencies frequently request and receive extensions of the due date.”
VIEWS wasn’t the only matter the watchdogs raised in their letter Friday.
The letter also includes exhibits the groups obtained through the Freedom of Information Act that showed the chief of staff was on numerous emails regarding Grassley’s concerns about matters such as conflicts of interest and whistleblower retaliation in the VA.
“We are disappointed that the committee has thus far shown no interest in thoroughly vetting the nominee’s record despite the serious issues raised by these whistleblowers on her watch,” the letter says. “The committee has a duty to scrutinize nominees to senior leadership positions like this and to inform fellow Senators about facts relevant to the exercise of their independent vote and participation in the constitutional advice and consent function.”